Concerning international decisions in the field of environmental protection in which the Slovenian Government is involved, citizens and NGOs are additionally entitled by the EPA, Art. 14 (1) and (2), to be informed about activities and procedures of governmental bodies related to the environment. In practice such information is actively disseminated in the information bulletin of the MoE. It is published monthly. The MoE's home page on the Internet provides information concerning international treaties and agreements which are/will be proposed to parliament for ratification.
Concerning international decisions in the field of environmental protection, citizens and NGOs may request any data related to international decisionmaking in which the Slovenian government is involved since the EPA, Art. 14 (1) and (2) provides that activities and procedures of governmental bodies are to be open to the public. To this end, governmental bodies are obliged to inform the public actively, as well as to provide information upon request.
| TABLE 4: International Decisionmaking | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initiation of DM (problem/ proposal) | Defining the scope, issues and stakeholders (pre-decision scoping) | Defining the scope of DM (impacts and alternatives) | Evaluation of the alternatives | Selection of the alternative (DM about the selected alternative) | Execution of the selected alternative | Post-decision monitoring & enforcement (feedback/ adjustment) | |
Phases of Decisionmaking LEVELS OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION |
|||||||
| Control of decisionmaking (right to decide) | 1* | - | - | - | 1** | - | - |
| Decisionmaking power is shared (right to joint decisionmaking) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Comments are seriously taken into account (right to be heard) | - | - | - | - | 1*** | - | - |
| Adequate notification (right to be informed) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | - | - |
| Access to information (right to access to information) | 2 | 2 | 2 | ¤ | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| * possibility of public Initiative, ** possibility of referendum, *** possibility of advisory referendum ¤ irrelevant since ratified treaties are published |
|||||||
There are no mandatory public hearings on proposals of regulations needed for the implementation of statutes, neither before governmental working bodies nor before ministries when they issue or prepare implementing regulations. However, when such cooperation occurs, the participants can give their suggestions, but cannot participate in decisionmaking (i.e. they have no right to vote).
Following the remarkable development of the nongovernmental sector of the society, it seems that change is to be expected in the field of public participation in the process of policymaking. As mentioned earlier, at the end of 1997, environmental NGOs were negotiating with the ministry on the guideline proposal on internal procedure, regarding public access to drafts of proposals of laws and implementing regulations and/or strategic and planning documents being prepared by the ministry. NGOs are also negotiating active public participation within the process of the preparation of such documents. If adopted, such guidelines would not appear to be enforceable.
| TABLE 5: Preparation and Approval of National Laws and Regulations | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initiation of DM (problem/ proposal) | Defining the scope, issues and stakeholders (pre-decision scoping) | Defining the scope of DM (impacts and alternatives) | Evaluation of the alternatives | Selection of the alternative (DM about the selected alternative) | Execution of the selected alternative | Post-decision monitoring & enforcement (feedback/ adjustment) | |
Phases of Decisionmaking LEVELS OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION |
|||||||
| Control of decisionmaking (right to decide) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Decisionmaking power is shared (right to joint decisionmaking) | 1* | - | - | - | 2* | - | - |
| Comments are seriously taken into account (right to be heard) | 2** | 2** | 2** | 2** | 1 | - | - |
| Adequate notification (right to be informed) | 5*, 4*** | 5*, 2*** | 5*, 2*** | 5*, 2*** | 5 | - | - |
| Access to information (right to access to information) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ¤ | 2 | 2 |
| * for laws, ** possibility of participation in parliamentarian and governmental working bodies, *** for regulations, ¤ irrelevant since adopted laws and regulations are published |
|||||||
From 1996 the environmental nongovernmental sector has, to a certain extent, been involved in the preparation of the first national program (not yet adopted at the end of 1997).
| TABLE 6: Preparation and Approval of National Strategies and Policies | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initiation of DM (problem/ proposal) | Defining the scope, issues and stakeholders (pre-decision scoping) | Defining the scope of DM (impacts and alternatives) | Evaluation of the alternatives | Selection of the alternative (DM about the selected alternative) | Execution of the selected alternative | Post-decision monitoring & enforcement (feedback/ adjustment) | |
Phases of Decisionmaking LEVELS OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION |
|||||||
| Control of decisionmaking (right to decide) | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - |
| Decisionmaking power is shared (right to joint decisionmaking) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Comments are seriously taken into account (right to be heard) | 2* | 2* | 2* | 2* | 1 | - | - |
| Adequate notification (1) (right to be informed) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | - | - |
| Access to information (right to access to information) | ¤ | ¤ | ¤ | ¤ | ¤ | 2 | 2 |
| *possibility of participation in parliamentarian and governmental working bodies, ¤ irrelevant since proposals submitted to parliament, changes to proposals within parliamentary procedure, and adopted documents are published (1) Evaluation concerns adoption of national strategies and policies in parliament after an official proposal is submitted. Process of prior preparation of such proposals by responsible governmental bodies is not very transparent. The MoEÕs home page on Internet provides timetable of national strategies and programs in the particular fields of environmental protection which are planned to be prepared and adopted in the ongoing year. |
|||||||
| TABLE 7: Preparation and Approval of Local Rules and Regulations | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initiation of DM (problem/ proposal) | Defining the scope, issues and stakeholders (pre-decision scoping) | Defining the scope of DM (impacts and alternatives) | Evaluation of the alternatives | Selection of the alternative (DM about the selected alternative) | Execution of the selected alternative | Post-decision monitoring & enforcement (feedback/ adjustment) | |
Phases of Decisionmaking LEVELS OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION |
|||||||
| Control of decisionmaking (right to decide) | 1* | - | - | - | 1** | - | - |
| Decisionmaking power is shared (right to joint decisionmaking) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Comments are seriously taken into account (right to be heard) | - | - | - | - | 1*** | - | - |
| Adequate notification (right to be informed) | - | - | - | - | 5 | - | - |
| Access to information (right to access to information) | - | - | - | - | ¤ | - | - |
| * possibility of local public initiative, ** possibility of local referendum, *** possibility of local advisory referendum, ¤ irrelevant since adopted documents are published |
|||||||
| TABLE 8: Preparation and Approval of Regional/Local Policies (Strategies) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initiation of DM (problem/ proposal) | Defining the scope, issues and stakeholders (pre-decision scoping) | Defining the scope of DM (impacts and alternatives) | Evaluation of the alternatives | Selection of the alternative (DM about the selected alternative) | Execution of the selected alternative | Post-decision monitoring & enforcement (feedback/ adjustment) | |
Phases of Decisionmaking LEVELS OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION |
|||||||
| Control of decisionmaking (right to decide) | 1* | - | - | 1** | - | - | - |
| Decisionmaking power is shared (right to joint decisionmaking) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Comments are seriously taken into account (right to be heard) | - | - | - | - | 1*** | - | - |
| Adequate notification (right to be informed) | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - |
| Access to information (right to access to information) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| *possibility of local public initiative, **possibility of local referendum, ***possibility of local advisory referendum |
|||||||
Public participation is ensured by the public presentation and public discussion of drafts of plans and implementing documents. Citizens can give comments, opinions and suggestions on the documents in question. After public discussion the final draft of a document is adopted. The administrative body in charge of the final version of the draft of the spatial implementation document is obliged to address the comments and suggestions which have been raised. Spatial implementation documents are important legal documents because they represent the basis for obtaining administrative permissions/permits for buildings and other space usages.
| TABLE 9: Preparation and Approval of Territorial Plans (Spacial/Local Land-Use Plans) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initiation of DM (problem/ proposal) | Defining the scope, issues and stakeholders (pre-decision scoping) | Defining the scope of DM (impacts and alternatives) | Evaluation of the alternatives | Selection of the alternative (DM about the selected alternative) | Execution of the selected alternative | Post-decision monitoring & enforcement (feedback/ adjustment) | |
Phases of Decisionmaking LEVELS OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION |
|||||||
| Control of decisionmaking (right to decide) | 1* | - | - | - | 1** | - | - |
| Decisionmaking power is shared (right to joint decisionmaking) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Comments are seriously taken into account (right to be heard) | - | - | 2 | 3*** | 3, 1¤ | - | - |
| Adequate notification (right to be informed) | 3 | 5 | 5*** | 5*** | 5 | - | - |
| Access to information (right to access to information) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ¤¤ | 2 | 2 |
| * possibility of local public initiative, ** possibility of local referendum, *** public hearings, ¤ possibility of local advisory referendum, ¤¤ irrelevant as adopted plans are published |
|||||||
The final decision regarding the allowance of the proposed project, once adopted by the responsible agency, must contain a statement that the opinions and comments forwarded by the public have been considered, including an explanation of the ways in which they have been considered.
The notion of "parties concerned" is defined by the EPA: it refers to those individuals and organizations for whom the decision on the issue discussed may encroach upon their right to a healthy and clean environment, in cases when special measures and stipulated restitution are prescribed for the danger to or depreciation of the environment.80 The "parties concerned" have the right to be party to the procedure of deciding on granting a license.81 Therefore, they may use all legal remedies for the protection of their rights in accordance with the rules of the general administrative procedure, as well as the right to judicial review.
| TABLE 10: Environmental Impact Assessment | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initiation of DM (problem/ proposal) | Defining the scope, issues and stakeholders (pre-decision scoping) | Defining the scope of DM (impacts and alternatives) | Evaluation of the alternatives | Selection of the alternative (DM about the selected alternative) | Execution of the selected alternative | Post-decision monitoring & enforcement (feedback/ adjustment) | |
Phases of Decisionmaking LEVELS OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION |
|||||||
| Control of decisionmaking (right to decide) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Decisionmaking power is shared (right to joint decisionmaking) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Comments are seriously taken into account (right to be heard) | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | - | - |
| Adequate notification (right to be informed) | - | - | 5* | 5 | 5 | - | - |
| Access to information (right to access to information) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ¤ | 2 | 2 |
| *public hearings, ¤ irrelevant as decisions are published |
|||||||
The issuance of construction permits is regulated by the Law on Construction (1984)83. Public participation is not foreseen in this process, although one of the elements which is subject to the permit is the analysis of the environmental impact of the construction in question.
| TABLE 11: Siting and Permitting | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initiation of DM (problem/ proposal) | Defining the scope, issues and stakeholders (pre-decision scoping) | Defining the scope of DM (impacts and alternatives) | Evaluation of the alternatives | Selection of the alternative (DM about the selected alternative) | Execution of the selected alternative | Post-decision monitoring & enforcement (feedback/ adjustment) | |
Phases of Decisionmaking LEVELS OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION |
|||||||
| Control of decisionmaking (right to decide) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Decisionmaking power is shared (right to joint decisionmaking) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Comments are seriously taken into account (right to be heard) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Adequate notification (right to be informed) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Access to information (right to access to information) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |